Introduction
Fraud risk assessment has always been a critical aspect of external audits, ensuring financial statements present a true and fair view of an organisation’s financial position. The ISA 240 fraud risk assessment standard, titled The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements, provides auditors with guidance on detecting and responding to fraud risks.
Recent updates to ISA 240 fraud risk assessment introduce significant changes designed to enhance fraud detection efforts. These updates reflect growing concerns over corporate fraud and rising expectations on auditors to identify material misstatements resulting from fraudulent activities. This article explores the latest updates to ISA 240 fraud risk assessment, their impact on auditors and businesses, and best practices for navigating fraud risk in external audits.
Understanding ISA 240 and Its Role in Fraud Detection
ISA 240 outlines external auditors’ responsibilities regarding fraud risk. It makes a key distinction between:
Fraudulent financial reporting – Intentional misstatements or omissions to manipulate financial results.
Misappropriation of assets – Theft, embezzlement, or misuse of a company’s resources.
The standard places strong emphasis on professional scepticism, requiring auditors to maintain a questioning mindset. While auditors must assess fraud risks, design appropriate responses, and obtain sufficient evidence, ISA 240 does not make them responsible for preventing fraud—that responsibility remains with management and governance bodies.
Key Updates to ISA 240 Fraud Risk Assessment
In response to increasing expectations for auditors to detect fraud, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) has introduced revisions to ISA 240 fraud risk assessment. These updates focus on:
1. Enhanced Focus on Professional Scepticism
Auditors must demonstrate heightened professional scepticism throughout the audit.
Greater emphasis on challenging management assumptions and estimates.
Required documentation of how professional scepticism was applied.
2. Strengthened Fraud Risk Assessment Procedures
Auditors must perform in-depth fraud risk assessments, focusing on business risks, industry risks, and internal controls.
Analytical procedures should highlight unusual trends or inconsistencies.
Expanded guidance on using data analytics to detect fraud risks beyond traditional financial reporting misstatements.
3. Greater Expectations for Communication and Documentation
Auditors must engage in more robust discussions with management and governance bodies about fraud risks.
Detailed documentation of fraud risk assessments, audit procedures, and conclusions is required.
Corporate governance and internal controls must be well documented and tested during the audit planning phase.
4. Use of Technology and Data Analytics
ISA 240 acknowledges the increasing role of technology in detecting fraud.
Auditors are encouraged to leverage data analytics and AI-driven tools to identify high-risk transactions and anomalies.
These updates reinforce a proactive approach to fraud detection, placing greater responsibility on auditors to assess, document, and respond to fraud risks comprehensively.
Impact of ISA 240 Fraud Risk Assessment on External Auditors
The enhanced requirements create several implications for external auditors, including:
Increased Workload and Documentation – More detailed fraud risk assessments require additional audit procedures, resulting in longer audit engagements.
Greater Accountability for Detecting Fraud – Auditors face heightened scrutiny over their fraud detection efforts, requiring strong evidence of professional scepticism.
Need for Additional Training – Audit firms must invest in forensic accounting training and fraud detection techniques to comply with ISA 240 updates.
Given these changes, firms must adjust their methodologies and allocate resources to meet the revised ISA 240 fraud risk assessment requirements.
What Businesses Need to Know
These changes also affect businesses subject to external audits. Companies should prepare for:
Increased Auditor Scrutiny – Expect auditors to ask more detailed questions about fraud risks, internal controls, and red flags.
Stronger Focus on Internal Controls – Weaknesses in fraud prevention mechanisms may be highlighted more frequently.
The Importance of Transparency – Businesses should provide clear documentation and open access to relevant financial data.
To minimise fraud risks and improve audit outcomes, companies should proactively strengthen internal controls, conduct regular fraud risk assessments, and foster ethical financial reporting practices.
Best Practices for Auditors in Navigating ISA 240 Fraud Risks
To align with the ISA 240 fraud risk assessment requirements, auditors should adopt these best practices:
1. Strengthen Fraud Risk Assessment Procedures
Implement deeper fraud risk analysis at the planning stage.
Involve forensic accounting specialists where necessary.
2. Improve Documentation and Justification
Maintain detailed records of fraud risk considerations and responses.
Justify decisions regarding fraud risk assessment in engagement files.
3. Leverage Data Analytics and Technology
Use AI-powered fraud detection tools to analyse large datasets.
Identify unusual transactions, related-party dealings, and misstatements.
4. Enhance Communication with Clients and Governance Bodies
Conduct in-depth discussions with management and the board on fraud risks.
Provide clear recommendations for strengthening internal fraud controls.
5. Commit to Ongoing Training and Awareness
Equip audit teams with up-to-date fraud detection skills.
Stay informed on emerging fraud trends and regulatory developments.
By implementing these strategies, auditors can improve their ability to detect fraud while ensuring compliance with ISA 240 fraud risk assessment revisions.
National Audits Group: Your Trusted Audit and Assurance Specialist
At National Audits Group, we stay ahead of evolving ISA 240 fraud risk assessment requirements. Our expert team ensures thorough fraud risk evaluations, leveraging data analytics and professional scepticism to strengthen financial integrity. Whether you’re an accounting firm or a business seeking audit support, we’re here to help. Contact us today to learn more.
Sanny Fajarini, Senior Auditor, National Audits Group
Further Reading:
Changing Auditors? What Every Accounting Firm Should Know
ASIC’s 2025 Crackdown on Audit Quality and Independence Issues
Ready for New Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards (ASRS)?
